AI proponents the world over are trying to ensure us that no AI will take anyone’s job. Will LawyerGPT change their minds?
The news on the AI front have been insane the last few weeks. It does seem that practically any job could potentially be overtaken with AI, depending on who you’re listening to at any given time. Carpenters, plumbers and others with jobs demanding a more hands on-approach seem to be safe, for now. What’s slightly different this time is that almost all of the jobs being replaced are jobs that require formal education and a long learning period for humans to do. It’s also mainly the middle class being outcompeted here.
Seen from a biological perspective, one type of job that humans is rather unfit for but the AI would be terrific at is lawyer. During education the main goal of a lawyer is to acquire and retain as much information as possible and to be able to easily retrieve the information and formulate a defence or accusation. In a comparison on that specific task – learning, memorizing, and retrieving information – between humans and AI, humans we would not stand a chance.
Lawyer feels like causing some chaos in his prof. with LawyerGPT
In this thread Eric Pacifici (@SMBLawGroup) showed some use cases for ChatGPT in his profession in this thread.
He states in the threadthat:
2 – Before ChatGPT
Historically, your options were to either (1) call a lawyer or (2) try to do research online and hope you’re right.
Calling a lawyer would be too expensive for a low-dollar dispute of this nature.
So, sadly, DIY was the only choice.
I’ve not included all tweets in the thread. If you wish to read the full thread it’s availablehere.
4 – Enter ChatGPT
Here we go!
You start by framing the question.
Your results are only as good as your prompt.
“Garbage in, garbage out!”
A good prompt includes the following:
- Issue – clearly define it
- Facts – provide relevant background
- Rules – state jurisdiction
- Objective – what you’re trying to accomplish
So, even though ChatGPT in it’s current iteration is perhaps not the most trustworthy lawyer you can find, it still does a good job at delivering you relevant information. As long as you fact check its statements and ask it to provide links or sources it can be an incredibly useful tool!
The progress in this area will be no slower than the process in AI image generation, see comparison below. The same prompt is used for both images, except for version number at the end. Version 2 of Midjourney (left image) was released April 12, 2022 and version 5.1 was released May 4, 2023.
Conclusion
What is the most likely outcome of this AI revolution for the law profession, specifically?
Lawyers will initially learn to use all of these new tools to make their work easier and more effective, as is our nature. This will reduce the amount of lawyers needed since a lot of work revolves around reading up on different cases, subjects, and laws. One can just as easily ask LawyerGPT and get the answer summarized in a few seconds instead of spending hours, perhaps days or weeks on a case.
As AI become smarter and new tools evolve, such as one click-prompts and perhaps AIs that solely learns from law material, the more it can take over the tasks of real lawyers.
To some extent they will still be needed to sign documents (although there’s already digital signing in Sweden, for example) and to actually be the ones speaking in courtrooms.
An example from the fashion industry
This is a new Nike ad is made entirely by AI. Try to calculate the cost this already have had to the people who are normally hired to do this kind of work. It includes, but are not limited to, models, make up-artists, designers, photographers, graphic designers, lighting specialists, set designers, etc.
Leave a Reply